“Ring” structures as a marking sign of the stress-strain state of the geo-medium

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2022-3-125-131
Читать на русскоя языкеL.K. Miroshnikova, A.Yu. Mezentsev, N.V. Semenyakin, N.E. Filippova
Polar State University named after N.M. Fedorovsky, Norilsk, Russian Federation
Russian Mining Industry №3 / 2022 р. 125-131

Abstract: Innovative solutions for identifying geodynamically active structures based on the morphostructural analysis of sedimentary deposits of the Tunguska series (Carboniferous-Permian), which are the upper level of the localization of ore-bearing massifs and rich sulfide platinum-bearing copper-nickel ores, are considered. The morphostructural groups of oval outlines identified on the isolinear distribution schemes of the top and bottom of the Tunguska series are considered as a marker of the “ring” structures development. These structures are developed along the boundaries of mine fields. Their formation took place in the period following the ore formation. Individual tectonic disturbances developed inside the “ring” structures and along their boundaries can be traced down to the occurrence depth of the ore-bearing intrusions and ore bodies. The “ring” structures were formed in the southwestern part of the Talnakh ore cluster as a result of left-sided strike-slip faults, which were accompanied by east-bound torsions. The “ring” structures are morphotectonic blocks that are distinguished by maximum tension indicators. As a result of the research, it was found that the “ring” structures are the marking signs of geodynamically active structures of the strike-slip and the oblique-slip kinematics with a high density of disjunctive disturbances, in which high risks in development of dangerous geodynamic processes and phenomena are possible in zones adjacent to the mine fields.

Keywords: Talnakh ore cluster, local geodynamic zoning, geodynamically active zones, “ring” structures, mine fields

For citation: Miroshnikova L.K., Mezentsev A.Yu., Semenyakin N.V., Filippova N.E. “Ring” structures as a marking sign of the stress-strain state of the geo-medium. Russian Mining Industry. 2022;(3):125–131. https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2022-3-125-131


Article info

Received: 04.05.2022

Revised: 23.05.2022

Accepted: 25.05.2022


Information about the authors

Lyudmila K. Miroshnikova – Dr. Sci. (Geolog. & Mineral.), Professor, Department of Mineral Deposit Development, Polar State University named after N.M. Fedorovsky, Norilsk, Russian Federation; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Aleksandr Yu. Mezentsev – Post-Graduate Student, Senior Lecturer, Department of Mineral Deposit Development, Polar State University named after N.M. Fedorovsky, Norilsk, Russian Federation; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Natalia V. Semenyakin – Post-Graduate Student, Senior Lecturer, Department of Mineral Deposit Development, Polar State University named after N.M. Fedorovsky, Norilsk, Russian Federation

Natalia E. Filippova – Associate Professor Department of Mineral Deposit Development, Polar State University named after N.M. Fedorovsky, Norilsk, Russian Federation


References

1. Galaov R.B., Kisel A.A., Andreev A.A., Zubkov V.V. Pre-stoping assessment of stress state of ore body S-2 in Skalistaya Mine. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016;(7):10–14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2016.07.02

2. Eremenko A.A., Darbinyan T.P., Aynbinder I.I., Konurin A.I. Geomechanical assessment of rock mass in the Talnakh and Oktyabrsky deposits. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2020;(1):82–86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2020.01.16

3. Petukhov I.M., Batugina I.M. Geodynamic zoning of underground resources. Leningrad: VNIMI; 1990. 129 p. (In Russ.)

4. Petukhov I.M., Batugina I.M. Geodynamics of underground resources. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nedra Kommyunikeishens LTD; 1999. 256 p. (In Russ.)

5. Batugina I.M., Batugin A.S., Petukhov I.M. et al. IZOS-ЗЗЗ Correction of geodynamic zoning maps of underground resources, produced in 1986-88 due to improvement of the plotting methodology: report on scientific research activities. Moscow: Moscow State Mining University; 2004. 33 p. (In Russ.)

6. Batugina I.M. et al. Guidance on geodynamic zoning of mine fields. St. Petersburg: VNIMI; 2012. 114 p. (In Russ.)

7. Sidorov D.V., Ponomarenko T.V. Estimation methodology for geodynamic behavior of nature-and-technology systems in implementation of mineral mining projects. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2020;(1):49–52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2020.01.09

8. Lan T., Zhang H., Li S., Batugin A.S., Zhao W., Li Q., Sun S. Application and development of the method of geodynamic zoning for forecasting the geodynamical danger at coal mines of China. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2018;(6):71–76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2018-6-71-76

9. Miroshnikova L.K., Mezentsev A.Yu., Kadyralieva G.A., Perepelkin M.A. Geodynamic zoning of the southwestern part of the Talnakh Orogenic System. Russian Mining Industry. 2021;(6):103–109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2021-6-103-109

10. Tarasov A.V. Typification of structural elements of Norilsk copper and nickel deposits. In: Geology and mineral resources of Norilsk Region, 2nd Norilsk Geological Conference. Norilsk: Norilsk Mining and Metallurgical Combine; 1971, pp. 150–153. (In Russ.)

11. Miroshnikova L.K., Mezentsev A.Yu., Semenyakina N.V., Kotelnikova E.M. Geodynamically Active Structures of Western Flank of Talnakh Orogenic System. Russian Mining Industry. 2020;(3):105–112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2020-3-105-112

12. Stazhevskii S.B. On the contribution of ring structures to the stress-strain state of the lithosphere and to metallogeny. Physical Mesomechanics Journal. 2005;8(1):65–70. (In Russ.)

13. Lukichev S.V., Semenova I.E., Zemtsovskii A.V., Gromov Ye.V. The Definition of the Protective Pillar Boundaries in Tectonically Stressed Rock Masses. Herald of the Kola Science Centre of RAS. 2019;(2):19–28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25702/KSC.2307-5228.2019.11.2.19-27

14. Osipova E.B. Gravitational stresses and layered blocky structures in the earth’s crust. Physical Mesomechanics Journal. 2021;(6):105– 115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1683-805X-2021-6-105-115

15. Livinskiy I.S., Mitrofanov A.F., Makarov A.B. Complex geomechanical modeling: structure, geology, reasonable sufficiency. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017;(8):51–55. (In Russ.).https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2017.08.09

16. Stacey T.R. Rock engineering design – the importance of process, prediction of behaviour, choice of design criteria, review and consideration of risk. In: Y Potvin (ed.), Design Methods 2015: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Design Methods in Underground Mining. Perth: Australian Centre for Geomechanics; 2015. pp. 57–76. https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1511_0.4_Stacey