On rock mass fracture mechanisms and patterns of hazardous zone formation in vicinity of mining technology elements

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-S1-69-74
Читать на русскоя языкеI.E. Semenova , O.G. Zhuravleva, S.A. Zhukova
Mining Institute Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russian Federation
Russian Mining Industry №1S / 2023 р. 69-74

Abstract: The article presents a summary of perennial research results regarding the issue of hazardous zone formation during mining operations in the Khibiny natural and technological system. The fundamental mechanisms of rock mass failure and regularities of formation of three types of hazardous zones in vicinity of mining technology elements have been determined with consideration of the man-made stress field parameters, structural heterogeneities and rock properties. Zones of high occurrence probability of the most hazardous geodynamic phenomena are identified which develop as a result of fault activation and movements of structural blocks along these faults; zones where dynamic events occur in immediate proximity from the excavation front or inside the pillars in conditions of compressive stresses concentration, which level approaches or exceeds the limit of the rocks compressive strength; zones where seismic events occur in the undermined rocks accompanying formation and development of ruptures in the hang-ups. Options are proposed for prediction and localization of each type of high geodynamic activity zones.

Keywords: rockburst hazard, rockburst, man-made earthquake, induced seismicity, monitoring, Khibiny rock mass, stress-andstrain state, failure mechanisms, mining operations

For citation: Semenova I.E., Zhuravleva O.G., Zhukova S.A. On rock mass fracture mechanisms and patterns of hazardous zone formation in vicinity of mining technology elements. Russian Mining Industry. 2023;(1 Suppl.):69–74. https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-S1-69-74


Article info

Received: 28.02.2023

Revised: 15.03.2023

Accepted: 21.03.2023


Information about the authors

Inna E. Semenova – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Chief of Laboratory of Prediction of Rockburst Hazard of Rock Deposits, Mining Institute Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russian Federation; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Olga G. Zhuravleva – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Prediction of Rockburst Hazard of Rock Deposits, Rock Mechanics Department, Mining Institute Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russian Federation; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Svetlana A. Zhukova – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Prediction of Rockburst Hazard of Rock Deposits, Rock Mechanics Department, Mining Institute Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russian Federation; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


References

1. Askaripour M., Saeidi A., Rouleau A., Mercier-Langevin P. Rockburst in underground excavations: A review of mechanism, classification, and prediction methods. Underground Space. 2022;7(4):577–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2021.11.008

2. Mazaira A., Konicek P. Intense rockburst impacts in deep underground construction and their prevention. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 2015;52(10):1426–1439. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0359

3. Hudyma M., Brown L., Cortolezzis D. Seismic risk in Canadian mines. CIM MEMO; 2016. 14 p.

4. Gibowicz S., Lasocki S. Seismicity induced by mining: Ten years later. Advances in Geophysics. 2001;44:39–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(00)80007-2

5. Kozlowska M., Orlecka-Sikora B., Dineva S., Rudzinski L., Boskovic M. What governs the spatial and temporal distribution of aftershocks in mining‐induced seismicity: insight into the influence of coseismic static stress changes on seismicity in Kiruna Mine, Sweden. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2021;111(1):409–423. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200111

6. Melnikov N.N. (ed.) Seismic activity during mining works. Apatity: Kola Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences; 2002. 325 p. (In Russ.)

7. Kozyrev A.A., Panin V.I., Semenova I.E., Zhuravleva O.G. Geodynamic safety of mining operations under rockburst-hazardous conditions in the Khibiny apatite deposits. Journal of Mining Science. 2018;54(5):734-743. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739118054832

8. Kasparyan E.V., Fedotova I.V., Kuznetcov N.N. Development of conceptions about the natural stress state of hard rock massifs. Herald of the Kola Science Centre of RAS. 2019;(3):65–79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25702/KSC.2307-5228.2019.11.3.65-79

9. Kozyrev A.A., Savchenko S.N., Panin V.I., Semenova I.E., Rybin V.V., Fedotova Yu.V. et al. Geomechanical processes in geological environment of mining systems and geodynamic risk management. Apatity: Kola Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences; 2019. 431 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37614/978.5.91137.391.7

10. Onokhin F.M. Specific structural features of the Khibiny rock mass and apatite-nepheline deposits. Leningrad: Nauka; 1975. 105 p. (In Russ.)

11. Zak S.I., Kamenev E.A., Minakov F.V. et al. The Khibiny alkaline rock mass. Leningrad: Nauka; 1972. 176 p. (In Russ.)

12. Vinogradov Y.A., Kremenetskaya E.O., Asming V.E., Zhirov D.V. Modern seismicity in mining areas in the Murmansk region. Journal of Mining Science. 2016;52(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739116010113

13. Syrnikov N.M., Tryapitsyn V.M. Regarding the mechanism of a mining-induced earthquake in the Khibiny. Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR. 1990;314(4):830–833. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.mathnet.ru/links/60295dd4b2e15c8db3c78a40004057c2/dan48980.pdf

14. Baranov S.V., Vinogradov A.N., Nikolaeva S.B., Petrov S.I. Seismicity of Kola Peninsula according to instrumental data. In: Modern methods of processing and interpretation of seismological data: Proceedings of the 6th International Seismological School, Apatity, August 15–19, 2011. Obninsk: Geophysical Service of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2011, pp. 47–51. (In Russ.)

15. Kozyrev A.А., Semenova I.E., Zhuravleva O.G., Panteleev A.V. Hypothesis of strong seismic event origin in rasvumchorr mine on January 9, 2018. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2018;(12):74–83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2018-12-0-74-83

16. Semenova I.E., Zhuravleva O.G., Zhukova S.A. Seismicity as an echo of stress-strain behavior change in rock mass in the course of mining. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2021;(6):46–58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2021_6_0_46

17. Kozyrev A.A., Onuprienko V.S., Zhukova S.A., Zhuravleva O.G. Induced seismicity of rock mass: development of instrumental and methodological support to control seismicity at the Khibiny apatite-nepheline deposits. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2020;(9):19–26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2020.09.02

18. Vinogradov S.D., Ponomarev V.S. Experimental studies of seismic modes. Priroda. 1999;(3):77–89. (In Russ.)

19. Semenova I.E., Zhukova S.A., Zhuravleva O.G. Development of seismic activity zones in undermined rock mass in hybrid opencast/ underground mining in Kirov mine. Fiziko-Tekhnicheskie Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopaemykh. 2022;(6):104–111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15372/FTPRPI20220611