Improvement of methods and means of geomechanical monitoring based on digital technologies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-5S-18-24

Читать на русскоя языкеI.Yu. Rasskazov1, Iu.V. Fedotova2, P.A. Anikin2, D.S. Migunov2, A.V. Konstantinov2
1 Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of Far Eastern branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, Russian Federation
2 Mining Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences is a separate division of the Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, Russian Federation

Russian Mining Industry №5S / 2023 р. 18-24

Abstract: The article discusses methods and technical means of instrumental assessment and control of rockburst hazard and technogenic seismicity during underground mining of ore. It is shown that in conditions of rockburst manifestation and anthropogenic seismicity, complex geomechanical monitoring with the use of a number of complementary methods and technical means is of key importance. The principles of measuring and computing complex construction and organization of integrated monitoring are disclosed using the case of a system created at the geodynamic testing sites of the area of the Streltsovsky and Dalnegorsky ore fields. The features and technical characteristics of measuring as well as software tools included in the monitoring system are listed. Algorithms and software have been developed to filter man-made interference and isolate useful signals, improve the accuracy of location and determination of parameters of acoustically active zones, processing and presentation of monitoring data using modern digital technologies. The scientific and methodological approaches to the study of extremely stressed complex-structured geological environment and the prediction of the hazardous dynamic manifestations of rock pressure in them, including those based on the isolation and parametrization of geomechanical fields and foci of destruction formed in a rockburst hazardous rock mass, are described. The results of complex geomechanical monitoring at a number of rockburst hazardous mines in Russia are presented and the possibility of effective management of rock pressure in rockburst hazardous conditions is shown.

Keywords: ockburst hazardous, rock mass, stress-strain state, seismoacoustic activity, geomechanical monitoring, digital technologies

Acknowledgments: The research was performed using the resources of the "Center for Processing and Storage of Scientific Data of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences" Center for Collective Use of Research Equipment, funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation under Agreement No.075-15-2021-663.

For citation: Rasskazov I.Yu., Fedotova Iu.V., Anikin P.A., Migunov D.S., Konstantinov A.V. Improvement of methods and means of geomechanical monitoring based on digital technologies. Russian Mining Industry. 2023;(5S):18–24. https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-5S-18-24


Article info

Received: 30.09.2023

Revised: 22.11.2023

Accepted: 30.11.2023


Information about the authors

Igor Yu. Rasskazov – Dr. Sci (Eng.), Corresponding Member of Russian Academy of Sciences, Director, Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of Far Eastern branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, Russian Federation; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Iuliia V. Fedotova – PhD. Sci. (Eng.), Leading Researcher, Laboratory of digital methods for research of natural-technical systems, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science of the Mining Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a separate division of the Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, Russian Federation

Pavel A. Anikin – PhD. Sci. (Eng.), Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Geomechanics, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science of the Mining Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a separate division of the Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, Russian Federation

Dmitry S. Migunov – Researcher, Laboratory of Mining Geophysics, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science of the Mining Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a separate division of the Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, Russian Federation

Alexander V. Konstantinov – Researcher, Laboratory of Geomechanics, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science of the Mining Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a separate division of the Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, Russian Federation


References

1. Lukichev S.V., Nagovitsyn O.V. Digital transformation and technological independence of the mining industry. Russian Mining Industry. 2022;(5):74–78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2022-5-74-78

2. Lukichev S.V. Digital past, present, and future of mining industry. Russian Mining Industry. 2021;(4):73–79. (In Russ.) https://doi. org/10.30686/1609-9192-2021-4-73-79

3. Neverov A.A., Neverov S.A., Tapsiev A.P., Shchukin S.A., Vasichev S.Y. Substantiation of geotechnologies for underground ore mining based on the model representations of change in the natural stress field parameters. Journal of Mining Science. 2019;55(4):582–595. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106273911904593X

4. Kurlenya M.V., Baryshnikov V.D., Baryshnikov D.V., Gakhova L.N., Kachal'sky V.G., Khmelinin A.P. Development and improvement of borehole methods for estimating and monitoring stress-strain behavior of engineering facilities in mines. Journal of Mining Science. 2019;55(4):682–694. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106273911904604X

5. Kurlenya M.V., Popov S.N. Theoretical bases for determining rock stresses. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1983. 97 p. (In Russ.)

6. Baryshnikov V.D., Baryshnikov D.V., Khmelinin A.P. Experimental determination of stresses in enclosing rocks of “Aykhal” mine, “Alrosa” enterprise. Interekspo Geo-Sibir. 2018;5:265–271. (In Russ.)

7. Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Zhu J.Z. The finite element method: Its basis and fundamentals. 6th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005.733 p. Available at: https://archive.org/details/finiteelementmet0000zien_q2q0

8. Zhang X. Particle Finite Element Method in Geomechanics. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The University of Newcastle; September 2014. 174 p. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301351333

9. Fadeev A.B. Finite element method in Geomechanics. Moscow: Nedra; 1987. 221 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.geokniga.org/bookfiles/geokniga-metod-konechnyh-elementov-v-geomehanike.pdf

10. Kurleniya M.V., Seryakov V.M., Eremenko A.A. Man-induced geomechanical stress fields. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 2005. 264 p. (In Russ.)

11. Kazikaev D.M. Geomechanics of underground ore mining. Moscow: Moscow State Mining University; 2005. 542 p. (In Russ.)

12. Neverov A.A., Konurin A.I., Shaposhnik Yu.N., Neverov S.A., Shaposhnik S.N. Geomechanical substantiation of sublevel-chamber system of developing with consolidating stowing. In: 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference, SGEM 2016. June 30–July 6, 2016. Albena, Bulgaria. 2016, vol. 2, pp. 443–450. https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2016/B12/S03.058

13. Feng D.-K., Zhang J.-M., Hou W.-J. Three-dimensional direct-shear behaviors of a gravel-structure interface. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2018;144(12):04018095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001968

14. Neverov A.A. Geomechanical substantiation of modified room-work in flat thick deposits with ore drawing under overhang. Journal of Mining Science. 2012;48(6):1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739148060093

1. Jiang F.F., Zhou H., Liu C., Sheng J. Progress, prediction and prevention of rockbursts in underground metal mines. China Journal of Rock Mechanic Engineering. 2019;38(5):956–972.

2. Manchao H., Fuqiang R., Dongqiao L. Rockburst mechanism research and its control. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2018;28(5):829–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.09.002

3. Keneti A., Sainsbury B.A. Review of published rockburst events and their contributing factors. Engineering Geology. 2018;246:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.005

4. Petukhov I.M., Egorov P.V., Vinokur B.Sh. Rockburst prevention on Mine’s. Moscow: Nedra; 1984. 230 p. (In Russ.)

5. Melnikov N.N., Kozyrev A.A., Panin V.I. Technogenic seismicity is a dangerous anthropogenic factor in mining operations in highly stressed massifs. Geoekologiya, Inzhenernaya Geologiya, Gidrogeologiya, Geokriologiya. 2015;(5):425–433. (In Russ.) 6 Kocharyan G.G., Budkov A.M., Kishkina S.B. Initiation of tectonic earthquakes during underground mining. Journal of Mining Science. 2018;54(4):561–568. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739118044014

7. Scott D.F., Williams T.J. Friedel M.J. Investigation of a rock-burst site, Sunshine Mine, Kellogg, Idaho. Krakow: Balkema: Rotterdam; 1997, pp. 311–315. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/NIOSH/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/irbs.pdf

8. Rasskazov I.Yu. Control and management of mining pressure at the mines of the Far Eastern region. Мoscow. Gornaya kniga; 2008. 329 p. (In Russ.)

9. He M., Xia H., Jia X., Gong W., Zhao F., Liang K. Studies on classification, criteria and control of rockbursts. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2012;4(2):97–114. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1235.2012.00097

10. Durrheim R.J. Mitigating the risk of rockbursts in the deep hard rock mines of South Africa: 100 years of research. In: Proceedings of the SME Annual meeting and exibition, 21–24 February 2010, Phoenix, Arizona. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, 2010, pp. 156–171.

11. Simser B.P. Rockburst management in Canadian hard rock mines. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2019;11(5):1036–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.07.005

12. Kozyrev A.A., Savchenko S.N., Panin V.I., Semenova I.E., Rybin V.V., Fedotova Yu.V. et al. Geomechanical processes in the geological environment of mining systems and geodynamic risk management. Apatity: Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Science; 2019. 431 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37614/978.5.91137.391.7

13. Petukhov I.M., Batugina I.M. Geodynamics of the subsurface. Moscow: Nedra; 1999. 287 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.geokniga.org/books/25997

14. Stewart R.A., Reimold W.U., Charlesworth E.G., Ortlepp W.D. The nature of a deformation zone and fault rock related to a recent rockburst at Western Deep Levels Gold Mine, Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa. Tectonophysics. 2001;337(3-4):173–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00028-2

15. Rasskazov I.Yu., Petrov V.A., Gladyr A.V., Tyurin D.V. Geodynamic test site in the Streltsovsky ore field: Practice and prospects. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2018;(7):17–21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2018.07.02

16. Shabarov A.N., Tsirel S.V., Morozov K.V., Rasskazov I.Yu. Concept of integrated geodynamic monitoring in underground mining. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017;(9):59–64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2017.09.11

17. Abrashitov A.Yu., Shabarov A.N., Korchak P.A., Kuranov A.D. Dealing with geodynamic safety challenges in cooperation with a mining company: A case-study. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2023;(5):40–48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2023.05.06

18. Melnikov N.N. (ed.) Methods and instruments for seismic-and-deformation monitoring of technogenic earthquakes and rockbursts. Novosibirsk: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2009. Vol. 1, 304 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.geokniga.org/books/21804

19. Melnikov N.N. (ed.) Methods and instruments for seismic-and-deformation monitoring of technogenic earthquakes and rock-bursts. Novosibirsk: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2009. Vol. 2, 261 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.geokniga.org/books/21803

20. Shevchuk R.V., Manevich A.I., Akmatov D.Zh., Urmanov D.I., Shakirov A.I. Modern methods, techniques and technical means of monitoring movements of the Earth crust. Russian Mining Industry. 2022;(5):99–104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2022-5-99-104

21. Lukichev S.V., Nagovitsyn O.V., Semenova I.E., Belogorodtsev O.V. Mine planning and design in MINEFRAME. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2015;(8):53–58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2015.08.12

22. Guzev M.A., Rasskazov I.Yu., Tsitsiashvili G.Sh. Algorithm of potentially burst-hazard zones dynamics representation in massif of rocks by results of seismic-acoustic monitoring. Procedia Engineering. 2017;191:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.151

23. Rasskazov I.Yu., Saksin B.G., Usikov V.I., Potapchuk M.I. Rock mass geodynamics and mining-induced rockbursting at Nikolaev complex deposit. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016;(12):13–19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2016.12.03