Russian potash industry: Issues of rational and safe mining

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2022-1-41-50
Читать на русскоя языкеА.А. Baryakh1, E.V. Smirnov2, S.Y. Kvitkin2, L.O. Tenison2
1 Perm Federal Research Center,Urals Branch of RAS, Perm, Russian Federation
2 PJSC Uralkali, Berezniki, Russian Federation

Russian Mining Industry №1 / 2022 р. 41-50

Abstract: The Russian Federation controls almost a quarter of potash fertilizer world market. Natural potassium salts serve as the main source for the fertilizer production. Mineral and raw materials base considers nine potash deposits to be on the state balance. However, potash mining in production quantities is currently executed only at the Perm region Verchnekamskoe deposit by four mines of the Uralkali Company and by the Usolskiy mine of EuroChem. During 2020 almost 52 million t were mined, which allowed to produce more than 14 million t of potash fertilizer. The main feature of salt deposit development is the necessity to protect the mines from fresh and brackish waters breakthrough. Experience of developing potash deposit throughout the world helped to formulate basic principles of mining operations. Protection of mine openings from underground and surface waters, that are corrosive to the rock salts, is secured by formation of a waterproof rock stratum, referred to as the waterproof pillar in mining practice, between the top of the upper mined layer and the bottom of the lowest aquifer. Usually, it is achieved through application of the room-and-pillar mining system that has to maintain the integrity of the waterproof pillar during the mine life until its liquidation and completion of the undermined rock mass deformation process. Despite the applied security measures, a significant number of mines were lost as a result of hazardous flooding. Three large-scale accidents took place at the Verchnekamskoe deposit. Mining and geological conditions that accompanied those hazardous situations are examined, and analysis of probable causes of water breakthrough into mine openings is carried out. Based on summarizing the experience of Verchnekamskoe potash deposit development it is demonstrated that the main factor that determines the efficiency of rock salt mining is provision of mining security and protection of mines from flooding. At the same time the approach to minimization of anthropogenic hazards should be based on applying justified engineering regulations at the mine planning stage and on the up-to-date information-based scientific support of the mining process, based on permanently functioning system of complex monitoring of the rock mass state.

Keywords: potash fertilizer, potash deposit, potash mine, security, waterproof pillar, failure criteria, monitoring, hazardous flooding

Acknowledgments: The Ensuring Safety of Mining Operations Section was supported by Grant No. 19-77-30008 of the Russian Science Foundation

For citation: Baryakh А.А., Smirnov E.V., Kvitkin S.Y., Tenison L.O. Russian potash industry: Issues of rational and safe mining. Russian Mining Industry. 2022;(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2022-1-41-50


Article info

Received: 29.12.2021

Revised: 18.01.2022

Accepted: 21.01.2022


Information about the authors

Alexander А. Baryakh – Doctor of Technical Sciences, Academician of RAS, Director, Perm Federal Research Center, Urals Branch of RAS, Perm, Russian Federation; e-mail: bar@miperm. ru

Eduard V. Smirnov – Technical Director, Uralkali PJSC, City of Berezniki, Perm Region, Russian Federation

Stanislav Y. Kvitkin – Head of Department, Uralkali PJSC, City of Berezniki, Perm Region, Russian Federation Lyudmila O. Tenison – Candidate of Technical Sciences, Head of the Department, City of Berezniki, Perm Region, Russian Federation


References

1. Emons H.-H. Die Kaliindustrie: Geschichte eines deutschen Wirtschaftszweiges. Sitzungsberichte der Leibniz-Sozietät, Leibniz-Sozietät. Trafo-Verlag; 2002. 140 p.

2. Kudryashov A.I. Verkhnekamsk salt deposit. Moscow: Epsilon Plyus; 2013. 429 p. (In Russ.)

3. Rauche H. Die Kaliindustrie im 21, Jahrhundert. Berlin- Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg; 2015. 580 p.

4. Halabura S.P., Hardy M.P. An Overview of the Geology of Solution Mining of Potash in Saskatchewan. Solution Mining Research Instititue: Fall 2007 Technical Meeting, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, October 8-9, 2007, pp. 2–18.

5. Dzhinoridze N.M. Petrotectonic basis for safe operation of the Verkhnekamsk potassium-magnesium salt deposit. St Petersburg; Solikamsk; 2000. 400 p. (In Russ.)

6. Borzakovsky B.A., Papulov L.M. Backfill operations in Verkhnekamsk potash mines. Moscow: Nedra; 1994. 234 p. (In Russ.)

7. Prugger F.F., Prugger A.F. Water problems in Saskatchewan mining – what can be learned from them? CIM bulletin. 1991;84(945):58–66.

8. Baryakh A.A. Geomechanical aspects of potash mines flood protection. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Gornyi Zhurnal. 1995;(6):185–192. (In Russ.)

9. Baryakh A.A., Sanfirov I.A., Dyagilev R.A. Monitoring of negative consequences of potassium mine flooding. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2013;(6):34– 39. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rudmet.ru/journal/1185/article/20231/

10. Malovichko A.A., Malovichko D.A., Kustov A.K. Solikamsk earthquake on January 5, 1995 (MS = 4.2). In: Earthquakes in Northern Eurasia in 1995. Moscow: Geophysical Service of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2001, pp. 163–169. (In Russ.)

11. Baryakh A., Asanov V., Gheghin A., Pankov I. Dynamic failure of salt interchamber pillars. Prace Naukowe Instytutu Geotechniki I Hydrotechniki Politechniki Wroclawskiej. 2001;73(40):12–13.

12. Baryakh A.A., Samodelkina N.A. Water-tight stratum rupture under large-scale mining. Part II. Journal of Mining Science. 2012;48(6):954–961. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739148060020

13. Vasilchuk M.P., Iofis M.A. Analysis of geomechanical processes and accident causes at Verkhnekamsk potassium-magnesium salt deposit. Mine Surveying Bulletin. 2007;(1):30–32. (In Russ.)

14. Zubov V.P., Kovalski E.R., Antonov S.V., Pachgin V.V. Improving the safety of mines in developing Verkhnekamsk potassium and magnesium salts. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2019;(5):22–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2019-05-0-22-33

15. Baryakh A.A., Tenison L.O. Justification of engineering safety criteria for undermining of water-proof layer in the Upper Kama Salt Deposit. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2021;(4):57–63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2021.04.08

16. Shulakov D.Yu., Butyrin P.G., Verkholantsev A.V. Seismological monitoring at the Upper Kama Potash Deposit: Objectives, problems, solutions. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2018;(6):25–29. https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2018.06.05

17. Bush V.A., Hebel H.-P., Schaffe M., Valter D.Yu., Baryakh A.A. Control of underworked areas subsidence using the radar interferometry methods. Mine Surveying and Subsurface Use. 2009;(2):38–43. (In Russ.) Available at: http://geomar-nedra.ru/articles/it/415-controlunderworked-areas-subsidence.html

18. Baryakh A.A., Sanfirov I.A., Fedoseev A.K., Babkin A.I., Tsayukov A.A. Seismic–geomechanical control of water-impervious strata in potassium mines. Journal of Mining Science. 2017;53(6):981–992. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739117063041