Monitoring of seismic activity in near-wall rock masses of open pits using seismic recorders in deep boreholes beyond the final pit boundary

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-S1-84-88

Kagan M.M., Chernobrov D.S. Mining Institute Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russian Federation Russian Mining Industry №1S / 2023 р. 84-88

Abstract: The article presents some results of monitoring seismicity in a rock mass at an open-pit ore mine. The research included an assessment of the seismic impact in the open-pit mining areas. As the result, strong seismic events, confined to the near-wall rock mass of the open-pit mine were registered with their hot-spots lying within the depth of 10 to 50 meters from the free surface. Potentially hazardous zones were identified in terms of wall stability loss as well as the zone of seismic events concentration. Locations of these zones in relation to the structural faults inside the rock mass were determined. Changes in their position over time were analyzed. The data obtained as a result of the study helped to establish the correlations between the dynamics of microseismic activity and the deformation processes in the near-wall rock mass. This information is of interest for specialists involved in geophysical control of geological media under man-made impacts as well as in geomechanics of surface mining.

Keywords: surface mining, open pit wall, rock mass, seismic method, seismic events, seismic activity, structural faults, fracturing

For citation: Kagan M.M., Chernobrov D.S. Monitoring of seismic activity in near-wall rock masses of open pits using seismic recorders in deep boreholes beyond the final pit boundary. Russian Mining Industry. 2023;(1 Suppl.):84–88. https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-S1-84-88

Article info

Received: 17.02.2023

Revised: 07.03.2023

Accepted: 09.03.2023

Information about the authors

Mikhail M. Kagan – Senior Researcher, Mining Institute, Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russian Federation; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7748-3288; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Dmitry S. Chernobrov – Junior Researcher, Mining Institute, Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russian Federation; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1602-9217; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

References

1. Yakovlev D.V., Tsirel' S.V., Zuev B.Y., Pavlovich A.A. Earthquake impact on pitwall stability. Journal of Mining Science. 2012;48(4):595–608. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739148040016

2. Dalatkazin T.S., Vedernikov A.S., Grigoriev D.V., Zamyatin A.L., Zuev P.I. Experience in application of geophysical methods in complex geodynamic diagnostics of rock massif. Russian Mining Industry. 2022; (1 Suppl.):105–110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2022-1S-105-110

3. Rybin V.V., Konstantinov K.N., Rozanov I.Y. A multilevel approach to pitwall stability monitoring. Journal of Mining Science. 2021;57(5):805–811. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739121050100

4. Li J., Wu Shun-Chuan, Gao Y., Xie Y., Ji M. Review of slope micro-seismic monitoring in open-pit mine. Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao / Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. 2014;33:3398–4013. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.s2.077

5. Kondela J., Prekopova M., Budinsky V., Pandula B., 􀄆uriška I. The importance of seismic methods application for geological reconstruction of rockslide threatened open pit. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2018;159:304–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.09.005

6. Azhari A., Ozbay U. Investigating the effect of earthquakes on open pit mine slopes. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2017;100:218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.10.005

7. Kozyrev A.A., Kagan M.M., Chernobrov D.S., Panasenko I.G. Microseismic monitoring system of the pit’s board array based on seismic sensors in deep boreholes beyond the final pit contour. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2022;(12-1):155–165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2022_121_0_155

8. Mounfort P., Mendecki A. Mine seismology reference book: Seismic sensor. Institute of Mine Seismology; 2016. 64 p.

9. Yakovlev D.V., Tsirel’ S.V., Mulev S.N. Laws of spreading and operational evaluation procedure for induced seismicity in mines and in mining areas. Journal of Mining Science. 2016;52(2):233–244. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739116020369

10. Chirkov E.B. Problems of short-term earthquake prediction: a formal aspect. Science and Technological Developments. 2021;100(1):5– 23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21455/std2020.3-4

11. Kumar S., Vig R., Kapur P. Development of earthquake event detection technique based on STA/LTA algorithm for seismic alert system. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 2018;92(6):679–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-018-1087-3

12. Luo X., Salvoni M., Dight P., Duan J. Microseismic events for slope stability analysis – a case study at an open pit mine. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 2018;118(3):205–210. https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2018/v118n3a2

13. Woodward K., Wesseloo J., Potvin Y. A spatially focused clustering methodology for mining seismicity. Engineering Geology. 2018;232:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.015

14. Lyutoev V.A. Degree evaluation of frequency zones activity on the basis of microseism conduct. Advances in Current Natural Sciences. 2018;(12-1):168–174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17513/use.36992