Multi-criteria assessment of rock bump hazard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2024-3S-48-52

Читать на русскоя языкеO.M. Usoltseva1, Ya.A. Volovik2
1 N.A. Chinakal Institute of Mining of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
2 VNIMI JSC, Prokopievsk, Russian Federation
Russian Mining Industry №3S / 2024 стр. 48-52

Abstract: A series of laboratory tests was carried out for 50 samples of different rock types (sandstones, siltstones, limestones, shaly silts) to evaluate the tendency of rocks to rock bumps. The tests were carried out using the Instron 8802 servohydraulic press in the uniaxial compression mode with the press clamp velocity travel of 0.1 mm/min. Five specimens were tested from each group of the same rock types. As the result, complete stress-and-strain diagrams including the post-peak deformation section were obtained. Evaluation of the rock bump hazard was performed using several criteria in order to compare their accuracy. Results of the calculations revealed that different criteria can give different estimates of the rock's tendency to bumps even for the same rock type. Based on analyzing the experimental data, it was concluded that the energy-based rock bump hazard indicator, defined as a difference value covering the entire rock fracture process, is the most reliable criterion.

Keywords: laboratory experiment, rock, rock bump hazard, stress-and-strain state, dynamic phenomena, rock bump hazard criteria, recession modulus, modulus of elasticity

For citation: Usoltseva O.M., Volovik Ya.A. Multi-criteria assessment of rock bump hazard. Russian Mining Industry. 2024;(3S): 48–52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2024-3S-48-52

Article info

Received: 11.05.2024

Revised: 18.06.2024

Accepted: 30.06.2024

Information about the authors

Olga M. Usoltseva – Cand. Sci. (Phys. and Math.), Senior Research Associate, N.A. Chinakal Institute of Mining of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Yana A. Volovik – Head of the Destructive Testing Laboratory, VNIMI JSC, Prokopievsk, Russian Federation; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

References

1. Сидоров Д.В., Потапчук М.И., Сидляр А.В., Курсакин Г.А. Оценка удароопасности при освоении глубоких горизонтов Николаевского месторождения. Записки Горного института. 2019;238:392–398. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2019.4.392 Sidorov D.V., Potapchuk M.I., Sidlyar A.V., Kursakin G.A. Assessment of rock-burst hazard in deep layer mining at Nikolayevskoye field. Journal of Mining Institute. 2019;238:392–398. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2019.4.392

2. Мороз Н.Е., Гендлер С.Г., Вьюников А.А. Газодинамические явления при проходке выработок во вмещающих породах кимберлитовой трубки «Интернациональная». Горная промышленность. 2023;(S1):96–102. https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-S1-96-102 Moroz N.E., Gendler S.G., Vyunikov A.A. Gas-dynamic phenomena in tunnel driving thought the host rocks of the ‘International’ kimberlite pipe. Russian Mining Industry. 2023;(1 Suppl.):96–102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-S1-96-102

3. Батугин А.С. Геодинамические эффекты предельно напряженного состояния земной коры. Горная промышленность. 2023;(S1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-S1-14-21 Batugin A.S. Geodynamic effects of the critically stressed state of the earth’s crust. Russian Mining Industry. 2023; (1 Suppl.):14–21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2023-S1-14-21

4. Мулев С.Н., Рукавишников Г.Д., Мороз Д.И., Пашкова В.И., Мороз Н.Е. Мониторинг напряженного состояния сейсмическими и расчетными методами на шахтах АО «Воркутауголь». Уголь. 2022;(12):88–93. https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2022-12-88-93 Mulev S.N., Rukavishnikov G.D., Moroz D.I., Pashkova V.I., Moroz N.E. Monitoring of the stress state by seismic and numerical methods at the mines of JSC “Vorkutaugol”. Ugol’. 2022;(12):88–93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2022-12-88-93

5. Cook N.G.W. The basic mechanics of rockbursts. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 1963;64:71–81.

6. Петухов И.М. (ред.) Прогноз и предотвращение горных ударов на рудниках. М.: Академия горных наук; 1997. 375 с.

7. Ставрогин А.Н., Тарасов Б.Г. Экспериментальная физика и механика горных пород. СПб.: Наука; 2001. 342 с.

8. Tarasov B.G., Randolph M.F. Superbrittleness of rocks and earthquake activity. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2011;48(6):888–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.06.013

9. Gong F.Q., Wang Y. L., Luo S. Rockburst proneness criteria for rock materials: Review and new insights. Journal of Central South University. 2020;27:2793–2821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-020-4511-y