Global potash industry in 2005–2025: resource base, mining and market constraints

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2026-4-18-21

Читать на русскоя языке I.V. Pleskunov1, D.P. Tibilov2, A.V. Zhura3
1  IMC Montan LLC, Moscow, Russian Federation
2  Odintsovo Branch of MGIMO University, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Odintsovo, Russian Federation
3  Coal Marketing Research Institute Ltd. (INKRU), Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Mining Industry №4/ 2026 p. 18-21

Abstract: The paper clarifies current development trends in the global potash industry with regard to the resource base, production structure, pricing environment and investment constraints in 2005–2025. Unlike studies that are focused mainly on the agrochemical market, this article treats potash salts as an object of the mining industry planning, where the geography of reserves, mine commissioning schedules, logistical resilience, and market and environmental constraints are of key importance. Methodologically, the study is based on comparing statistics from the U.S. Geological Survey, analytical materials from the FAO, the IFA and the World Bank, industry publications and data on major capacity-expansion projects. The results show that the global market remains highly concentrated, i.e. Canada, Russia, Belarus, China and Germany account for the main share of production, while the resource base is distributed much wider than the current operating capacity. In 2025, world potash production reached 49 million tonnes of K2O, the consumption was estimated at 38.8 million tonnes of K2O, and the aggregate capacity is projected to increase from 66.1 million tonnes of K2O in 2025 to 77.4 million tonnes of K2O by 2029. The industry’s development will be determined not only by the growing food demand, but also by the companies’ ability to overcome capital intensity challenges, environmental requirements and geopolitical constraints on supply [1–4].

Keywords: potash salts; potash fertilizers; underground mining; mineral resource base; global reserves; production capacity; food security; geopolitical risks; pricing environment; mining projects

For citation: Pleskunov I.V., Tibilov D.P., Zhura A.V. Global potash industry in 2005–2025: resource base, mining and market constraints. Russian Mining Industry. 2026. No. 4. P. 18–21. DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2026-4-18-21.


Article info

Received: 12.03.2026

Revised: 04.05.2026

Accepted: 25.05.2026


Information about the authors

Igor V. Pleskunov – Director of European Affairs, IMC Montan LLC, Moscow, Russian Federation; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Dmitry P. Tibilov – Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor, Department of Innovation Management, Odintsovo Branch of MGIMO University, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Odintsovo, Russian Federation

Andrey V. Zhura – Candidate of Science (Economics), Director General, Coal Marketing Research Institute Ltd. (INKRU), Moscow, Russian Federation


References

1. U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Potash [Electronic resource] / U.S. Geological Survey. – Reston, VA, 2026. – P. 146–147. – URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026.pdf (accessed: 30.06.2026).

2. Stewart W. M., Dibb D. W., Johnston A. E., Smyth T. J. The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agronomy Journal. 2005. Vol. 97. No. 1. P. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0001.

3. Bryukhanov D.V., Suslova A.V. World market of mineral fertilizers: current conjuncture and prospects. Applied Economic Research. 2023. No. 4. P. 65–73. DOI: 10.47576/2949-1908_2023_4_65. (In Russian).

4. FAO. Developments in the global fertilizer markets: report CCP 22/INF/7. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2022. URL: https://www.fao.org/3/nj408ru/nj408ru.pdf (accessed: 22.06.2026). (In Russian).

5. Zemskov A.N., Maximovich N.G., Meshcheryakova O.Yu. Modern trends in the development of the potash industry in the world. News of the Tula State University. Earth Sciences. 2022. No. 3. P. 369–382. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-tendentsiiv-razvitii-kaliynoy-promyshlennosti-v-mire (accessed: 22.06.2026). (In Russian).

6. Kopittke P.M., Menzies N.W., Wang P., McKenna B.A., Lombi E. Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security. Environment International. 2019. Vol. 132. Article 105078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105078.

7. Spirenkov V.D. The role of the world mineral fertilizer market in providing food to the population. Dis. ... Cand. Econ. Sci. Moscow, 2023. 144 p. (In Russian).

8. Baryakh A.A., Devyatkov S.Yu., Denkevich E.T. Mathematical modeling of the development of the displacement process during mining of potash ores with longwall faces. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023. Vol. 259. P. 13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2023.11.

9. Danileva N.A., Daniliev S.M., Bolshakova N.V. Identification of a deep brine aquifer in chemogenic rocks based on well logging and 2D seismic data. Journal of Mining Institute. 2021. Vol. 250. P. 501–511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2021.4.3. URL: https://pmi.spmi.ru/pmi/article/view/14767?setLocale=ru_RU (accessed: 22.06.2026).

10. Cross L., Gruère A., de Sousa J., Chtioui H. Public Summary: Short-Term Fertilizer Outlook 2024–2025. Paris: International Fertilizer Association, February 2025. URL: https://www.fertilizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2024_ifa_short_term_outlook_report.pdf (accessed: 22.06.2026).

11. Asian Development Bank. Food Security in Asia and the Pacific. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2013. 131 p. URL: https://www.adb.org/publications/food-security-asia-and-pacific (accessed: 22.06.2026).

12. PJSC Uralkali. Annual reports and disclosure [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.uralkali.com/ru/investors/reporting_and_disclosure/ (accessed: 30.06.2026). (In Russian).

13. UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport 2023: Towards a green and just transition. New York: United Nations, 2023. 156 p. URL: https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2023 (accessed: 22.06.2026).

14. Yen C. Suffering Succotash: What Happened to Our Potash? U.S. International Trade Commission, 2025. URL: https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/suffering_succotash_what_happened_our_potash.htm (accessed: 22.06.2026).

15. Nikishichev S.B., Zhura A.V., Tverdov A.A. Optimization of methods for assessing the budget efficiency of field development projects taking into account the multiplier effect of investments and socio-economic impact. Coal. 2026. No. 3(1203). P. 52–58. DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2026-3-52-58. URL: https://www.ugolinfo.ru/artpdf/RU2603052.pdf (accessed: 01.07.2026). (In Russian).

16. Baryakh A.A., Smirnov E.V., Kvitkin S.Yu., Tenison L.O. Russian potash industry: problems of rational and safe subsoil use. Mining Industry. 2022. No. 1. P. 41–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30686/16099192-2022-1-41-50. URL: https://mining-media.ru/ru/article/newtech/17147-kalijnaya-promyshlennost-rossii-problemy-ratsionalnogo-i-bezopasnogo-nedropolzovaniya (accessed: 22.06.2026). (In Russian).

17. The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2024. 287 p. URL: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-ofcritical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions (accessed: 22.06.2026).

18. Our Growth Plan. K+S Potash Canada, 2026. URL: https://ks-potashcanada.com/what-we-do/bethune-mine/ (accessed: 22.06.2026).

19. Jansen Potash Project. BHP Group, 2024. URL: https://www.bhp.com/what-we-do/global-locations/canada/jansen (accessed: 22.06.2026).